Discovery of a Signal: An intercepted signal coming from the Moon is a classic, high-stakes science fiction trigger, a compelling event that triggers this (fictional) mission to the Moon.

The NASA/ESA angle: This is an ambiguous signal—perhaps complex, repeating patterns similar to the fictional "DNA-style" signals sometimes theorized in other contexts, that are only initially picked up by a deep-space network or a specific lunar-observing mission. The ambiguity necessitates a manned mission to investigate.

HAL and the ARK's Role: Our idea of HAL and the ARK being the only entities with the data and computing power to decode or properly survey the signal's source is cinematic gold. This creates a reliance on the specialized crew and technology, justifying their central role in the mission.

Evidence of Life: The discovery of evidence of other life on the Moon is a monumental event that would instantly trigger a high-priority mission.

The Nature of the Find: This might not be a living organism, but a biosignature—perhaps an unexpected concentration of organic molecules, fossils in an ice sample from a permanently shadowed crater, or a unique biological byproduct found by a robotic lander or rover (like the kind used in current Mars or icy moon exploration proposals). All of these possibilities are for John Storm to discover and interpret.

HAL and the ARK's Role: If the discovery is a subtle anomaly in vast datasets (e.g., spectral analysis of lunar dust or ice), the advanced data processing capabilities of HAL and the ARK would be crucial for initial identification and later, for guiding the human investigation on the lunar surface. This adds a layer of mystery and technical necessity.

Dr. Elias Vance, was the Scapegoat Engineer, after a serious launch blunder at NASA. The only person that supported him at all was Anya Sharma, a self-made technology billionaire. 

Core Identity and Expertise

Age: Late 50s Location: Clear Lake City, Texas (near NASA's Johnson Space Center) Specialty: Applied Aerospace Engineering, High-Stress Structural Adaptation, and Unconventional Propulsion Systems. Current Status: Independent Principal Engineer, Founder of Elias Dynamics, LLC.

The Fall from Grace: The Canis Major Disaster

Dr. Vance's NASA career was defined by a single, catastrophic event and its devastating fallout.

NASA Role: Before the incident, Vance was on the fast track—a rising Astronaut Candidate with a Ph.D. from MIT, specializing in the structural integrity and GNC (Guidance, Navigation, and Control) of deep-space vehicles. His true brilliance, however, was as a design engineer, where he felt safest—building reliable systems, not trusting himself to pilot them.

The Canis Major IV Incident (2019): Vance was the lead designer for a critical structural component on the Canis Major IV launch vehicle. The component failed during ascent, leading to the loss of three astronauts.

The Scapegoat: The subsequent investigation revealed that the failure was not due to Vance’s design but to a supply chain defect combined with management-level pressure to bypass a mandated safety review to meet political launch deadlines. However, the organization needed a quick, high-profile closure. Vance, being a rigorous scientist who had expressed prior (ignored) concerns, was politically expedient to sacrifice. He was forced to "carry the can," resigning in disgrace while others received internal reassignment.

The Emotional Scar: Vance doesn't just feel anger; he feels a cold, surgical guilt that the system allowed the failure. His engineering is now driven by an almost obsessive need for triple redundancy and absolute control—a reaction to the political chaos that destroyed his past.

Personal Life and Isolation

The Divorce: The immediate fallout of the Canis Major disaster was the collapse of his personal life. His wife, Dr. Leah Vance, a brilliant but ambitious neuroscientist, found the public scrutiny and loss of professional status unbearable. She didn't leave because she doubted his innocence, but because she couldn't tolerate living outside the elite NASA orbit. This rejection hardened Vance, leading to a profound sense of isolation and mistrust of intimacy.

Current Existence: He lives a spartan, emotionally contained life in a quiet, isolated house near the water, focusing entirely on his work. His social life consists of occasional, grudging meetings with his former NASA colleagues who still covertly rely on his unmatched technical expertise.

Motivation: His success with Elias Dynamics, LLC, isn't about profit; it's about vindication. Every successful, flawless launch or bespoke design he delivers is a silent rebuke to the NASA bureaucracy that betrayed him.

Complicating Factors for the Swann Mission

1 The Ethics of the CyberCore: Vance is deeply wary of the CyberCore Genetica interface within John Storm. It represents a system that is too complex, too human, and too difficult to fail-safe—everything his engineering now strives to eliminate. His professional admiration for Storm is tinged with distrust of the technology that makes Storm essential.

2 The Meloni Conflict: Musket Meloni, the wealthy backer, is exactly the kind of arrogant, cost-cutting private financier Vance spent his career fighting against. Vance views Meloni as a necessary evil, creating an internal conflict between his need for high-profile work (vindication) and his ethical stance against corporate corner-cutting.

3 The Trimaran: The fact that he is forced to adapt a compromised structure—an ocean-going trimaran—rather than building a purpose-built vessel, is a constant source of professional agony. The project is an intellectual challenge, but it constantly reminds him of the compromises that ruined his career. His parachute safeguard for the sea landing is as much a tribute to Storm as it is a stubborn engineer's nod to the unpredictable chaos of the real world. 

Elias is in awe of Musket Meloni, the world's first trillionaire, also an advocate of space exploration. While, Meloni has been following the work of Dr. Vance, very much enamored. 

The good doctor had never heard of John Storm before he was head-hunted by Anya Sharme, even with the media cover of his exploits on the high seas, and the saving of Kulo-Luna, the humpback whale.

The Elizabeth Swann V2: Architectural Feasibility of Hydrodynamic to Lunar Vehicle Conversion

A White Paper Thesis by Dr. Elias Vance - Chief Architect, Storm Exploration Ventures

Abstract

This paper analyzes the engineering rationale and execution behind the conversion of the ocean-going trimaran Elizabeth Swann (V1) into the Elizabeth Swann V2 (ESV2), a Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) vehicle designed for a 45-day crewed mission to the Moon. The ESV2 project was a study in resourcefulness, challenging the conventional wisdom of spacecraft design by adapting an existing, structurally complex hydrodynamic hull for vacuum operations. The primary technical hurdle involved transforming the massive, pressure-unrated hull into a habitable pressure vessel while mitigating the high mass penalty. The solution centered on a highly augmented, non-chemical propulsion system using large-scale, modified solar arrays and efficient ion thrusters to achieve the necessary delta-V ($\Delta V$) for lunar transit, validating the concept of extreme cross-domain vehicle repurposing.

1. The V1 Architecture and the Lunar Mandate

The original Elizabeth Swann (V1) was a robust, multi-hull ocean trimaran optimized for high-speed waterborne transport. Its structure—featuring three distinct hulls and an extensive rigging system—posed immediate and formidable challenges when adapting for the space environment, particularly concerning mass-to-volume ratio and pressure retention.

The ESV2 conversion was driven by the necessity for a rapid, crew-rated lunar transport solution within an aggressive development cycle. The 45-day mission required a vessel capable of supporting a five-person crew while executing the long, low-thrust maneuvers characteristic of SEP.

1.1. Structural Integrity and Pressurization

The primary engineering solution involved the retention of the central hull structure (the "Ark" housing the original accommodation and helm) and the removal of the outer hulls and legacy rigging. The central hull was encased in a bespoke, composite outer pressure shell, converting the interior volume into a habitable environment.

Mass Mitigation: To compensate for the inherent mass of the V1 hull, non-essential internal components were stripped, and advanced, lightweight composite reinforcement was employed only where critical, targeting a vacuum-rated structure with minimal volume creep.

Legacy Retention: The existing five-person accommodation and helm layout were retained within this new pressure vessel, offering crew familiarity and reducing crew training requirements.

2. Propulsion System: Modified Solar Electric Paradigm

Given the unavoidable high starting mass resulting from the V1 conversion, traditional chemical propulsion was deemed infeasible. The ESV2 adopted Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP), a high $\text{I}_{sp}$ (Specific Impulse) solution, to achieve the necessary orbital transfers over the 45-day window.

2.1. The Modified Solar Design

The V2 mandate specifically required an enhancement of the solar design. This resulted in the deployment of massive, articulated photovoltaic arrays significantly larger than any conventional system.

Design Rationale: The SEP system uses low-thrust ion engines, which require enormous electrical power over extended periods. The modified arrays employed triple-junction cells and thermal management layers to maximize energy capture efficiency in the cold vacuum of space, far exceeding the performance of the original V1's power systems.

Thrust: The generated power fueled a cluster of Hall-effect ion thrusters, continuously providing the low, steady acceleration necessary for the $45$-day trajectory to lunar orbit.


3. Integration of Control and Life Support

The core intellectual property of the Swann lineage—the ARK and HAL systems—was critical to managing the complex low-thrust, long-duration flight.

3.1. HAL and ARK

The Heuristic Algorithmic Logic (HAL) served as the primary GNC (Guidance, Navigation, and Control) authority, managing the minute-by-minute thrust vectoring of the ion engines and optimizing the energy-to-thrust ratio based on solar flux measurements. The Autonomous Remote Krill (ARK) remained the crew's tactical interface, responsible for simplified trajectory oversight and system health monitoring, maintaining the original operational feel of the helm.

3.2. Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS)

For the 45-day mission, a semi-closed-loop ECLSS was implemented, prioritizing robustness and simplicity over maximum efficiency.

$\text{O}_2$ and Water: Reliance on stored consumables with a high-efficiency $\text{CO}_2$ scrubber (e.g., solid amine system) was favored, given the non-reusable nature of the conversion. A 60-day consumable margin was maintained for contingency.

Radiation Management: Unlike the ESV3's active shielding against solar events, the ESV2 relied primarily on the bulk mass of its retained hull and water stores for passive radiation protection during transit through the Van Allen belts and subsequent exposure in cis-lunar space.

4. Conclusion: A Proven, Resourceful Step

The Elizabeth Swann V2 successfully demonstrated the feasibility of converting a complex Earth-bound vessel into a functioning lunar spacecraft. While the high mass penalty due to the retained structure makes this a non-optimal approach for future fleet operations, the project provided invaluable data on large-scale solar array performance, high-mass $\Delta V$ maneuvers using SEP, and the successful transition of human factors (accommodation and helm) into a space environment. The ESV2 acted as an essential technological bridge, validating systems and crew procedures that now inform the next-generation, purpose-built spacecraft, culminating in the Nuclear Thermal Propulsion architecture of the ESV3.

End of Thesis

CAST 0F CHARACTERS

...

This website is Copyright © October 2025 Planet Earth Trust..

This is a work of fiction, the characters are the product of the authors imagination, except where real or historical persons are included

But where that may be so, the thoughts and actions of those persons is fictional and not those of any historical or real person.